FEMDOM SLAVERY

According to many, the relationship between Mistress and slave is based on sexual attraction. She’s in charge, but She also listens to his needs (a daily blowjob for example) and respects his limits. So, at the end of the day, when all is mildly whipped and lovingly slapped, he is the puppet-master and She’s the puppet. Call me a primitive, but I believe in the simple and accurate definition of the word slave: someone who is the property of another person and is forced to work and obey. Come on, She doesn’t need our permission to punish us! And She sure as hell doesn’t need to take our limits into consideration. She can use and abuse us to Her heart’s content. Take our money, and our nuts while She’s at it, put our dick in the nick for months on end, sell us to the highest bidder or donate us to a vivisectionist. And what are we going to do about all this? File a complaint? For what? For being a slave? We chose the path of submission ourselves, no one forced us. So embrace it, regardless of how painful, humiliating, confusing it can be. Regardless of how much we dislike certain things. If you want to be a slave, then act like one. No limits, no restrictions, no rights, no way out. Anything less has nothing to do with slavery.

3 comments

  1. I’m with you 100%. Consensual Slavery is an oxymoron. We all understand that this is at best a legal fig leaf in case some community stalwart gets on our case. It is enforced domination at the most and the enforcement itself can run afoul of various laws as soon as the locals get wind of it. Such domination is easy target for selective enforcement of statutes that have been buried deep ever since voted some decades ago if not longer.

    Which leaves us at square one again – the sexual attraction angle as mentioned in the posting above. The (re)negotiation process involved is – let’s face it – haggling and is rather untoward in anything approaching the genuinely serious condition of slavery. It’s demeaning and is the antithesis of what slavery is really about as its legal underpinnings have been well defined and developed by various ancient and medieval civilizations. The system of Roman Slavery alone is an excellent source if one is to establish initial owner – slave legal framework while taking utmost care to equalize if not reverse the Roman gender privileges altogether. In Ancient Rome women did own slaves but were limited socially in other ways, even free women were effectively their husband ‘s property though they couldn’t just be killed for no reason as slave could. Placing the woman as legal head of household as well as establishing female line of inheritance etc would start this ball rolling but this is already getting deep into nerd territory so let’s not dive in this particular rabbit hole just yet.

    So… where were we – square one, the mutual sexual attraction which would drive two individuals to establish a voluntary framework where one of them is so deeply enthralled with the other that is willing to put this other in position of authority to a degree far surpassing anything seen in the mass-market D/S relationships.
    Please note that this is not the ultimate authority however. Historically speaking the enforcement of slavery as an institution always has been dependent on external coercion with, roughly speaking, three major components – the shackle, the whip and finally the noose for any recalcitrant property whose keep far outweighed any benefits to the owner.
    All three are either legally problematic or made outright illegal. How and why is another deep dive into Nerd Lake so let’s just say that monopoly of violence is the cornerstone of every modern state and the state doesn’t want any competition. At all. So that vivisectionist donation is unlikely to materialize not the least because the poor vivisectionist would be too terrified and not of the slave owner.

    Which underscores the underlying issue yet again – namely – the complete dependence of Mistress – slave relationship on the slave’s upbringing, training and internal moral framework which must effectively replace external coercion with internal need to comply with Mistress demands even at the cost of slave’s life. Especially at the cost of slave ‘s life. It’s the self-sacrifice at the altar of obedience that scares away 999 out of 1000 who once thought of themselves as slaves. And this is likely very charitable estimate. Anything less ultimate sacrifice may still result in bonded person, not a slave. There was a reason why under Roman Law a slave wasn’t even seen as person and society as a whole was fully on board with this. For Roman domestics the economic benefits to the Owner were tangible and usable domestic help as also live, talking and thinking sex doll always at hand for anything and whose opinions were normally disregarded assuming anyone cared to ask.
    Said domestics could also be put to death at will although later Roman laws limited this particular choice and made it subject to preconditions for strictly managerial reasons. This was then.

    Which leaves us to find that elusive other whose conviction is as strong as ours. It does look like the pursuit of One True Love, doesn’t it? I’d argue we’re talking about the flip side of the same coin but we have enough on our plate as it is.

    As said in posting above:

    ”So embrace it, regardless of how painful, humiliating, confusing it can be. Regardless of how much we dislike certain things. If you want to be a slave, then act like one. No limits, no restrictions, no rights, no way out.”

    Actions matter.

  2. On further thought I do have to mention the late and truly great Ingrid Bellemare whose literary work is available and to the best of my knowledge consists of two titles, both instruction manuals:

    > Owning And Training A Male Slave
    > Serving Me – Slave Instruction Manual

    One has to remember that those were written twenty-plus years ago so certain social attitudes have changed since then, sometimes radically. I won’t elaborate or run any spoilers here assuming that whoever reads this may not have had the chance to read those titles.
    An important note to anyone blindly replicating the coercive blackmailing tactics as described in the book: at present there are special legal statutes on the books that deal with this sort of activities specifically and the Internet is not even old news anymore, it’s just another utility bill among many. True, the spirit of the law was valid even back then when those titles were published but now it is spelled in black and white in no uncertain terms. Besides, said tactics’ coercive effect isn’t quite there anymore due to ongoing social changes and the slow acceptance of former taboos as the new normal.

    With all this said I’d like to concentrate on the main thesis of Ingrid Bellemare books: that it is of utmost importance to concentrate on the maintenance of what Ms Bellemare called ”differential” that needs to exist between Mistress and her living property – at all times and without fail. ”Owning And Training Of Male Slave” goes into great detail of how exactly Ms Bellemare has chosen to do this in her own life and most importantly – why. There’s a lot in the book to take in as the author is uncompromising in her demand for perfection. The methods described therein are meant to be modified to suit other Mistress’ taste in things and the underlying message gets amplified more and more with every page turned. While the initial time investment dedicated to slave training is considerable it pays off at the later stages when her property becomes so well trained in Mistress’ specific ways that it takes very little to adjust the rules, enforce them or add new set aiming for perfection in delinquent areas.
    ”Serving Me – Slave Instruction Manual” on the other hand feels more of an (needed)addendum to the first book – clearly specifying service, duties and expectations described in truly minute details as practiced by the author. Just like the first book it is an excellent source to build on and is important example of what could be done given time and dedication. Both books are rather blunt about that certain level of well-measured and shall I say – precise – but never in anger viciousness that is necessary to achieve the desired result. One has to remember that the lack of wide social approval and state legal sanction leaves Mistress with no other option but to maintain rigid social structure. Surveillance, self-examination, sacrifice and reforming punishment are intertwined in perpetuity and this is the price to be paid if this small sanctuary is to survive in a hostile world. There’s a unequivocal dictatorship on board of this tightly run ship and excuses for failure are not accepted as indeed they would make no sense. It is this close if very unequal bond that has survived the test of time in Ms Bellemare’s life and it sets truly great example for others to follow. Perhaps not to the letter but certainly in spirit.

    I wonder if we’ll ever see the modern remake of these books in print some day. Without taking anything away from Ms Bellemare’s work the modern revolution in communication, home automation and surveillance does open up so many new possibilities as far as means and methods are concerned. The purpose however will always be the same.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *